litphoria

message

You're not signed-in. If you're new, why don't you take a moment to read the site's intro?
View litphoria Introduction

Feedback ยท (Discussion) Is the mating cycle trait worthwhile, and should we keep or remove it? (closed)

related to Delete the Mating Cycle trait

A recent suggestion got me thinking about our mating cycle (litphoria.com) trait: do we actually need this thing? Is it important, do people actually care and search by it? The original suggestion for it (closed as a duplicate of what really got implemented) doesn't offer anything to explain.

It's got four options: none (you don't mate), or menstrual/estrous/opportunitistic suggesting your mating pattern. But thinking about it, is that actually important to know? For people into impregnation, the actual important detail is whether you're into one of our pregnancy interests, not whether you have a mating cycle. And is the mating cycle important enough to actually define in a trait?

It's also a bit redundant given a character's genitals: penis = usually opportunitistic, vagina = usually menstral or estrous, none = no mating cycle. Or if you have genitals anyway but don't want to concern yourself with the whole mating thing, you just put pregnancy in No.

I understand estrous is something some people are into, though that comes across to me as an interest or a theme kinda thing.

So do we actually need this trait? Is it important to you, do you use it? I feel as though it's not worthwhile and probably worth removing - does it have value or should it get removed? What are your thoughts about it?

meta info

endorsement points: 0

created: 19 May 16 at 06:53 AM (build: 5/18/2016 4:00 AM beta)

closed: 24 May 16 at 02:13 AM (build: 5/22/2016 7:22 PM beta)

Sheena-Tiger

I for one tend to totally ignore it... as I am not into pregnancy and will very unlikely accept it in a play. If it is accepted the cycle does not influence as for the sake of the rather short RP it is the right time anyway or it would not happen. ^^

.

Yeah, it's a bit awkward to set and I feel the options don't say much. Estrous as an interest isn't perfect either but seems better.

Desdemona Fireheart

"In heat" is something I might use for Neko-characters. It's more about being horny than about being fertile though.

Astarte

I don't use it and have no plans to.

Marceithus

I agree that it does seem a bit redundant, given the fact for those that are interested in such things it will be the necessary cycle.

Kai Li'on

Seems a little unnecessary, but I don't see any reason why to remove it all together at its different animals do have different mating cycles.

Astarte

True, but I see no value in keeping it unless it's something people would seriously go hunting out in a search. If it's not something being searched, it'd be better handled by a description of the character or through discussion I believe. I don't believe the point of the traits system is to fully describe every aspect of your character, but to categorize them for easy searching.

.

Agreed.

Marceithus

I agree, granted I am fairly new to this site, but I don't ever see myself searching by mating cycle. Nor do I see it being used as a criteria for searching at all really. When I saw the mating cycle trait my first thought was what is the point of that?

  Got something to say? Why don't you register and participate?
Litphoria has a unique community feedback system, where the community decides what profile options are available, and what order new features are developed.

I want my voice heard! tell me more!