litphoria

message

You're not signed-in. If you're new, why don't you take a moment to read the site's intro?
View litphoria Introduction

Feedback ยท Change the order of feedback in the 'mine' filter to put open feedback first, closed feedback last. (implemented)

Currently, the 'mine' filter is ordered like so: in review, solved, closed, implemented, accepted, rejected, awaiting endorsement, needs discussion. (I don't know where in progress or new sit.)

The bolded states are the ones that represent open feedback, where we still can give it attention (or need to give it attention, in the case of needs discussion). However, these re buried and mixed in with the other types of feedback.

I suggest that the feedback in this filter should have the open feedback placed together at the beginning, possibly in an order of earliest in the process & most needing attention, to latest in the process and least needing attention. If I've got it right (taking liberties for how bug and feedback states interleave) new, needs discussion, awaiting endorsement, accepted, in review, in progress.

meta info

endorsement points: 10

created: 28 March 15 at 08:11 AM (build: 3/26/2015 2:21 AM beta)

closed: 30 March 15 at 01:47 AM (build: 3/26/2015 2:45 AM beta)

Roel

I would actually prefer if solved, implemented and rejected were not on that list at all. I want to browse stuff I put there and want to push forward, poke at in discussion and the like, not... I dunno, have my epeen grow from watching how many pages list of stuff I put there is.

As for suggestion - 'accepted' is actually further down the pipe than 'in review' so you might want to switch the order of these two.

Velus

Isn't 'in review' a bug status that's somewhere around 'accepted' and 'in progress', as a general ambiguous "I'm working on it" status? I figured that'd logically belong between accepted and in progress.

I'd want solved, implemented and rejected to stay. I personally wanted this list so that I could have an easier time digging out my own feedback if I needed to get to it again, such as to refer to it. I may need to refer to feedback regardless of whether it's been implemented or not.

And, heck, sometimes I do want to look over what I've had implemented - it's satisfying seeing I've made a difference, and sometimes I think I've made far less than I really have, so it's good to have reminders sometimes.

Velus

If I'm totally wrong or confused it should definitely be arranged differently, I might have lost track at which step that happens.

Wrecked Avent Site Administrator

Things which need attention should be at the top of the list (e.g needs discussion). Then a rough order of implementation, so new -> in review -> accepted -> implemented / solved. The other "closed" statuses like rejected and closed will sit after that.

  Got something to say? Why don't you register and participate?
Litphoria has a unique community feedback system, where the community decides what profile options are available, and what order new features are developed.

I want my voice heard! tell me more!